Data Centers in Minnesota
51 locations found
Need Bare Metal Servers?
Explore Bare Metal Servers in Minnesota
Need help finding the right data center?
Share your requirements and our experts will provide a complimentary, tailored solution that fits your needs and your budget.
Explore Markets in Minnesota
Data Centers in Minnesota: Low-Latency Reliability for the Upper Midwest
Minnesota supports 51 data center locations operated by 55 providers, with one cloud region, 17 cloud on-ramps, and robust connectivity spanning 106 networks. Colocation, dark fiber, IP transit, bare metal, and dedicated rack products are widely available in the state, with facilities serving both regional and national demand. Cities such as East Grand Forks and Minneapolis host notable facilities, including deployments at 232 20th St NW and 511 11th Ave S. For market entrants, Minnesota offers a targeted data center sales tax exemption for large data centers above 25,000 sq ft tied to investment levels, and there is a proposed extension that would exempt certain software purchases based on peak electricity demand thresholds. Industrial power is competitively priced at $0.0929/kWh, and agreements between data center developers and utilities such as Xcel Energy are accelerating the deployment of clean energy, exemplified by the supply of 1,900 megawatts of new clean energy to digital infrastructure projects. Large data centers - and especially those pursuing artificial intelligence - are driving more electricity demand, prompting infrastructure upgrades and rigorous environmental review at city and state levels. State law mandates that large data centers fund their own operational and utility infrastructure enhancements, protecting other ratepayers from increased costs. Environmental review and public engagement requirements are integral, especially for proposed data center development; for example, a Google campus in Pine Island has drawn both litigation seeking further environmental review and community scrutiny, reflecting the active participation of Minnesota communities and elected officials. Regulatory frameworks require ongoing reporting of water usage from facilities and encourage public informational sessions. The state's FEMA National Risk Index is rated low, reducing operational risk profiles. The combination of network diversity, clean energy strategies, public transparency requirements, and established tax incentives positions data centers in Minnesota as attractive for expansion, advanced artificial intelligence applications, and ongoing digital infrastructure investment.
Minnesota: At A Glance
| Factor | Rating / Data | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Global Connectivity Grade | A | Dense carrier ecosystem centered in the Twin Cities. |
| Direct Cloud On-Ramps | Over 4 | Local access to AWS and Microsoft Azure. |
| Power Cost | $0.0929/kWh - as of June 2026 | EIA state industrial average (latest release: March 2026 data). |
| Disaster Risk | Low (24.66) - as of December 2025 | One of the most geologically stable regions. |
| Tax Incentives | Yes | Significant sales tax exemptions for qualified equipment. |
| Sales Tax | 6.88% - as of June 2025 | State rate applies to non-exempt transactions. |
Network & Connectivity Ecosystem
Minnesota's data center ecosystem features 51 data center buildings and 55 providers spread across multiple city markets, addressing increasing demand for advanced connectivity, artificial intelligence workloads, and high electricity capacity. Network infrastructure includes 106 networks and 7 internet exchanges, anchored by the Midwest Internet Cooperative Exchange (MICE) in Minneapolis, increasing direct peering opportunities for deployments. In-city connectivity is defined by access to 17 dedicated internet access and 20 private Ethernet line providers, as well as 5 dark fiber operators serving major locations, creating options suited to both hyperscale and enterprise environments. Cabinet, cage, and rack colocation products are available at 21 providers, and a Minnesota-located cloud region brings additional resources and cloud on-ramp presence for organizations scaling artificial intelligence or data analytics. Large data centers - including recent construction activity in cities such as Pine Island - are required to pay for their own electricity and infrastructure upgrades, limiting cost burdens for other local ratepayers when demand increases or when more electricity is needed for artificial intelligence processing or storage expansion. Proposed data center projects in the state undergo mandatory environmental review prior to approval, including site-specific study of grid, capacity, and water impacts; this has contributed to active public engagement and participation from elected officials in municipal or city planning processes. Minnesota's data center plan review and zoning laws, such as those amended in the Monticello 2040 Vision + Plan, focus further development only in designated city industrial zones, subject to assurance that buildings or deployments do not constrain municipal expansion or demand for city services. Investments, such as Google's planned facility in Pine Island, now trigger coordinated infrastructure and grid planning to maintain reliable and affordable electricity for city and state customers. Ongoing environmental review processes mandated for proposed facilities - such as those supporting artificial intelligence applications - are intended to guide sustainable market growth in Minnesota while balancing network resilience, capacity needs, and long-term city development.
Sustainability Analysis - Water & Power Use
Data centers in Minnesota face mounting scrutiny over water consumption and electricity demand, particularly as requirements for artificial intelligence workloads increase. State legislation requires annual public reporting of water usage by all data centers, and elected officials have introduced proposals for stricter oversight of large data centers. Industry data shows a sustained rise in water consumption; Microsoft, for example, has reported a roughly 34% year-over-year increase. Since the consumptive nature of data center water use means water is frequently lost from local watersheds through evaporation, city planning bodies - including zoning boards in locations such as Monticello - evaluate proposed data center development more closely, often demanding environmental review of utility connections, water usage, and future city growth impacts.
On electricity, Minnesota's industrial rate averages $0.0929/kWh, favoring large data centers with competitive operating costs for both powering traditional server loads and advanced artificial intelligence training. However, demand for more electricity has led to utility supply partnerships prioritizing clean energy. Xcel Energy's new agreement with Google will add 1,900 megawatts of clean energy, helping ensure new and proposed data center campuses accessing the network do not shift costs to other users. As electricity demand for data centers in Minnesota grows - driven by digital workloads and artificial intelligence adoption - Xcel Energy and other electric service providers are tasked with maintaining reliable supply while supporting environmental review measures.
Proposed data center construction has prompted ongoing public engagement and, in certain cases, a halt to construction activity. Litigation seeking additional environmental review of the Google data center campus in Pine Island is pending, with a court date set for April 2026, reflecting how local and state agencies balance technological progression with water and power stewardship. Some city plans restrict large data centers to light industrial parks, requiring assurance that their presence and utility demand will not hinder broader city or community growth. Collectively, these conditions affect both site inventory and operational sustainability for data centers in Minnesota, positioning clean energy procurement and diligent water management as central to ongoing and proposed projects.
Environmental Constraints For Data Center Projects
Data center projects in Minnesota face strict environmental requirements related to water use. Operators must annually disclose their water usage both to the legislature and on their websites, responding to growing concerns as sector water consumption rises - exemplified by a 34% surge in Microsoft's use in just one year. Additionally, new legislative proposals are seeking even more rigorous oversight of large data centers' water consumption.
Local Development Review
A recent partnership between Xcel and Google aims to add 1,900 megawatts of new clean energy to Minnesota's grid. This agreement is designed to advance the state's carbon-free objectives and stimulate significant local investment, without raising costs for current energy customers.
Market Access, Business & Tax Climate
Minnesota offers a mix of stable business conditions and competitive incentives that draw data center developers and operators to various city locations across the state. With 51 active data centers in Minnesota, supported by 55 providers and over 100 networks, inventory covers most standard systems types and connectivity needs. Key city hubs provide diverse offerings, from rack and cage solutions offered by 21 providers, to dark fiber and IP transit, with direct access to at least 17 high-speed DIA providers and multiple cloud on-ramp sites. Data center development is shaped both by legislative priorities and by active involvement from communities, as local planning authorities and elected officials weigh the benefits and challenges of each project. Environmental review is central to the process: each proposed data center, especially large data centers, faces statutory requirements for reviewing site impacts, utility and electric service demands, and impacts on city growth trajectories. Public engagement in city forums and community sessions is a standard element, enabling residents across Minnesota communities to provide input before development approval.
Sales tax incentives in Minnesota favor data center projects meeting minimum investment or size thresholds, with a standard state sales tax of 6.875% and targeted exemptions available for qualifying facilities. Proposed policy updates tie software tax exemptions to periods of peak electricity demand, further aligning benefits with operational scale. Large data centers are required to finance their own systems upgrades and operations, so the cost of additional electricity demand does not shift to existing city ratepayers. The industrial power rate in Minnesota, approximately $0.0929/kWh, helps support business case modeling, an important factor for data center developers forecasting demand for artificial intelligence and high-density compute. Power procurement agreements, including recent deals involving Google and regional utility Xcel Energy, highlight the emphasis on securing more electricity from new clean energy sources and integrating flexible planning for expanding grid capacity. Site-specific environmental review often extends to scrutinizing water availability and usage, with state law requiring annual disclosures of data center water consumption and current oversight efforts gaining attention in city and legislative debates.
The permitting process involves both technical and social diligence, as proposed data center projects shape economic opportunity but also trigger debate among Minnesota communities over resource use and local development priorities. Construction activity can be paused pending completion of environmental review or in response to legal challenges, underscoring the complexity of large data center buildout in active city regions. Opportunities for data center developers expand as Minnesota cities adjust zoning and amend regional plans, often restricting permitted data center development to light industrial park areas and linking approvals to environmental review, electricity grid readiness, and fiscal alignment with city objectives. As artificial intelligence workloads and digital systems demand increase, the Minnesota regulatory environment continues to evolve, balancing incentives for data center growth with rigorous controls on land use, utilities, and stakeholder participation.
Community Review
Insights gathered through the AUAR process play a crucial role in helping communities weigh planning and zoning choices, especially as debates arise over the impacts of proposed developments. This structured input fosters more informed and transparent decision-making at the local level.
Natural Disaster Risk
Minnesota is rated low for natural disaster risk, with a FEMA NRI Score of 24.66, which provides a favorable landscape for data center operations compared to many other states. Severe weather events like hail, strong wind, land subsidence, drought, and wildfires are noted risks but occur at lower frequencies than national averages. For large data centers or any proposed data center sites, Minnesota's review processes require an environmental review to assess potential site hazards, including weather-related and geotechnical risks for each city. Proposed data or artificial intelligence projects triggering new construction activity must undergo these reviews, which inform approval decisions by elected officials and city planners. This diligence ensures that construction aligns with local land plans and that increasing electricity demand for data and artificial intelligence is balanced with hazard mitigation. In practice, the Google data center in Pine Island has been challenged in litigation seeking further environmental review, reflecting the state's cautious approach. Additional risk factors like water usage or more electricity demand are also evaluated, with requirements for transparency and public engagement before large data centers or proposed data expansions receive final site approval. As demand and new artificial intelligence loads increase, the state maintains oversight to keep resilience standards high for data systems.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the typical power demand or capacity of data centers in Minnesota?
Typical power demand and capacity for data centers in Minnesota is rising sharply as artificial intelligence workloads and city digital systems expand. Statewide, large data centers may request industrial-class electricity service agreements, and one recent proposed data project in Pine Island, planned by Google with Xcel Energy, will be paired with 1,900 megawatts of new clean energy added to the grid. Minnesota requires environmental review for every proposed data project, especially those with large power or water demands, and city elected officials often oversee public engagement on these plans as construction activity proceeds. Some city plans restrict large data center locations or require review of electricity demand and systems costs so benefits are weighed before approval. In response to more electricity required by artificial intelligence and data services, legislators have proposed tying new tax incentives to electricity demand thresholds. Environmental review continues to be required for all proposed data center construction, increasingly scrutinized for power use, cost, and systems impacts across Minnesota.
Where are the primary data center clusters or regions in Minnesota?
The primary data center clusters and regions in Minnesota are concentrated in and around the Twin Cities metropolitan area, particularly Minneapolis and St. Paul, where facilities like 511 11th Ave S host dense connectivity options to meet growing electricity demand from artificial intelligence and data-driven services. Other city locations in Minnesota - such as East Grand Forks and Pine Island - also feature significant large data centers, with Pine Island recently announced as the site for a major Google campus, although the project faces litigation seeking further environmental review. Monticello has amended its city plan to allow large data centers in specific land zones, responding to rising industry interest and the proposed expansion of systems to support more electricity and lower costs. Minnesota's city-based clusters continue to attract proposed data projects due to tax benefits, affordable electricity, and public engagement directed by elected officials and environmental review requirements, ensuring that new construction meets strict standards while addressing the costs and demand created by artificial intelligence, modern applications, and the need for more electricity.
What types of network connectivity are available to data centers in Minnesota?
Data centers in Minnesota have access to diverse network connectivity, including dark fiber, **Ethernet private line**s, dedicated internet access, and IP transit, provided by over 55 network providers and 17 cloud on-ramps. Facilities such as those at 232 20th St NW, East Grand Forks and 511 11th Ave S can leverage 106 unique network options and connect via seven regional internet exchanges, supporting digital systems for artificial intelligence workloads and rising electricity demand. As more proposed data projects are planned in city light industrial areas, construction activity and systems costs are often reviewed through environmental review and AUAR processes, involving input from elected officials and public engagement. Large data centers must accommodate increasing demand for more electricity and connectivity, in line with Minnesota legislation requiring these facilities to plan and fund necessary upgrades so that both cost and benefits are balanced city by city.
How does Minnesota compare in terms of natural disaster risk for data center operations?
Minnesota offers low natural disaster risk for data center operations, with a FEMA NRI Score of 24.66. The main risks to proposed data center sites in Minnesota include hail, drought, high winds, ice storms, and tornadoes, but these risks rank substantially lower than in many regions with higher disaster frequency. Local city officials and elected officials play a key role in reviewing large data centers, and environmental review requirements are enforced before construction activity can proceed. Cities conduct detailed site and utility impact plans before approval, and large data centers must fund their own systems and account for increased electricity demand and more electricity use as artificial intelligence workloads and demand for digital services grow. Public engagement, environmental review plans, and scrutiny from both city representatives and residents help mitigate localized risks. This combination creates benefits for reliability and long-term data operations compared to regions with greater disaster exposure.
What is the presence of colocation and hyperscale data centers in Minnesota?
Minnesota hosts 51 data center facilities operated by 55 providers, serving artificial intelligence and enterprise workloads across multiple city locations. Large data centers in Minnesota, such as the proposed Google data campus in Pine Island, must navigate significant environmental review processes, construction activity stipulations, and peak electricity demand thresholds in city plans. Elected officials and planning bodies require environmental review for all proposed data facilities, monitoring water and electricity demand to balance growth with local land use, electricity reliability, and city expansion. Public engagement around proposed data development has increased, particularly with construction activity and environmental review impacting community debates in city forums. Large data centers are subject to city-led requirements that they pay for their own systems costs, and ongoing construction and planning reflect both artificial intelligence data demand growth and increasing electricity demand. Minnesota offers sales tax exemptions for qualifying data centers, but as more electricity and water are needed for new data projects, city and state-level environmental review is emphasized to ensure proposed benefits and costs are clearly assessed and integrated into city plans.
What local review factors matter for data center development in Minnesota?
Key local review factors for proposed data center development in Minnesota include compliance with city zoning plan requirements, thorough environmental review, and transparent public engagement. Elected officials and regulatory bodies apply the AUAR process to assess data tied to site impacts, utility and electricity demand, and large land parcels. City plans, like Monticello's, restrict proposed data center locations to designated industrial zones, requiring review of how planned construction activity, systems costs, and projected electricity use may affect growth and reliability for existing residents. Large data centers must cover systems costs tied to more electricity, ensuring no upward pressure on rates for others. Minnesota requires that data centers report water usage - an area receiving more scrutiny from both elected officials and the public as the demand for fresh water rises. Recent construction activity in cities such as Pine Island highlights concerns over land use, with legal and environmental review at the center of city and state decisions. Public engagement sessions are used to inform communities and gather comments, while ongoing review weighs the benefits of artificial intelligence applications against costs and local land, water, and electricity constraints for large-scale and proposed data center projects.
How does clean energy affect data centers in Minnesota?
Clean energy is increasingly shaping the operation of data centers in Minnesota by supporting rising electricity demand driven by artificial intelligence and proposed data center growth. Agreements like the partnership between Google and Xcel Energy plan to bring 1,900 megawatts of new clean energy to the state grid, aiming to fulfill carbon-free goals and manage costs so that city ratepayers are not burdened by more electricity use. Elected officials and environmental review processes ensure that large data centers proposing construction activity or expansion must account for land use, public engagement, and electricity demand through transparent planning. Minnesota statutes require environmental review for each proposed large data center, with detailed data on electricity, water use, and land impacts reported. Cities such as Monticello only approve proposed data center land in designated areas after reviewing demands for electricity and public input, while construction activity, costs, and systems plans are scrutinized for both economic benefits and environmental requirements.